Before textiles became the center of his practice, Victor was moving between creative disciplines, trying to understand where his own language might live.
Graphic design initially seemed like the direction. He had always been interested in art, but the path wasn’t immediately obvious. It was only during university, when he encountered textile practice differently, that something shifted.
He saw his sketches come alive through fabric.
That transformation changed the way he understood the medium.
“Textiles became the medium through which I could express myself most honestly,” he says.
There was something about the physicality of it — the stitches, patterns, textures and even the mistakes — that felt capable of carrying meaning in ways other disciplines hadn’t. What began as an exploration of another creative medium became a realization: this was the language through which he wanted to speak.
His relationship with textiles is therefore not simply about making clothes or objects. It is about using material to construct a world.
He describes his work as creating “dimensions where everything has their physics,” fictional spaces informed by both imagination and reality. That sense of world-building is central to the practice. His pieces have to exist materially — they have to be wearable, constructed, functional — but they are also expected to transport the person encountering them somewhere else.
That is where his background in fine art and design becomes useful.
He is interested in the space between craft and contemporary art, but he doesn’t seem particularly concerned with choosing one side.
Instead, he sees the relationship as a matter of balance.
His work can exist as art, but it can also be worn. It can appeal to someone interested in fashion while still offering something to someone approaching it as an artwork.
At the center of both is the same desire: expression.
“I love to create worlds that I can exist in,” he says, “like dimensions where everything has their physics.”
That idea also explains the importance of material.
For him, texture, color and technique aren’t decorative additions that come after the idea. They are part of how the idea becomes legible.
Texture can create a feeling. Color can establish a mood or carry symbolism. Technique determines how the story moves through a piece.
The material is not simply what holds the work together.
It is part of the language.
That attention to material places his practice in conversation with a much longer history.
African textiles have always carried information beyond their visual appeal. Patterns, techniques, colors and methods of production can contain histories, identities, social meanings and inherited knowledge. But Victor is wary of treating that history as something that must simply be reproduced.
He describes his practice as “a continuation of history rather than a reproduction of it.”
That distinction is important.
To continue something is to allow it to move.
He respects the traditions and generations of makers that came before him, but his interest isn’t in recreating their work exactly as it existed. He wants to understand the foundations well enough to experiment with them.
Preservation and experimentation, in his view, aren’t opposites.
They depend on one another.
“Innovation grows from understanding,” he says.
It is a philosophy that allows his practice to occupy a productive middle ground between heritage and contemporary expression. Traditional knowledge becomes a starting point rather than a boundary.
Patterns can be bent.
Ideas can be reimagined.
Techniques can meet contemporary construction.
Ancient knowledge can encounter contemporary thinking.
The result isn’t meant to sever the connection to history, but to demonstrate that history is still capable of producing something new.
Storytelling sits underneath all of this.
Before beginning a design, he researches the ideas, histories and mythologies that might eventually become part of the work. His fascination with mythology from different cultures has stayed with him, informing the way he thinks about design and the worlds he creates.
Themes of divinity, grace, love, identity, culture and human connection repeatedly find their way into the practice.
Sometimes they are obvious.
Sometimes they sit beneath the surface.
But he thinks of each textile as carrying its own narrative, with line, pattern, color and texture contributing to the story.
That is why he doesn’t want the work to end at visual appreciation.
A piece can be beautiful and still leave something unanswered.
He wants the viewer to become curious about what exists behind the surface — the concepts, histories and stories that led to the final object.
For him, textiles become vessels for that curiosity.
And perhaps this is where his understanding of African textile practice becomes particularly expansive.
He argues that one of the things most frequently overlooked about African textiles is the knowledge embedded within them. Their beauty is often immediately recognizable; the craftsmanship, technical expertise and cultural significance behind that beauty can be much easier to overlook.
There is also a practical knowledge that risks being lost.
People may admire handmade African textiles without knowing how they should be cared for, maintained or preserved. As global fashion continues to influence how people dress and consume, the traditions surrounding these materials can become increasingly distant from the people who wear them.
But functionality matters too.
African textiles were not created simply to be beautiful.
They were developed within particular climates, lifestyles and cultural contexts. Comfort, adaptability and practicality are part of their story.
And for Victor, preserving that story requires more than admiration.
It requires infrastructure.
He points to the need for greater investment in fiber production, mills and manufacturing across Africa. Without the systems that support textile production, cultural knowledge can be celebrated while the material conditions required to sustain it remain fragile.
The future of African textile practice, then, isn’t only a question of aesthetics.
It is also a question of what we build around the people making it.
His own practice is moving toward that larger vision.
The different creative interests that once existed separately — graphics, fashion and styling — are beginning to converge. Rather than abandoning those earlier interests, he is finding ways for them to inform one another.
What once looked like several possible directions is becoming a single creative identity.
He is increasingly interested in developing distinctive textile collections and expanding the visual language of his work. The ambition is not simply to make more pieces, but to push the narrative possibilities of textiles further.
To make objects that are visually compelling, but also capable of carrying cultural dialogue.
To create work that can travel without becoming detached from where it came from.
And eventually, to build something larger than an individual practice.
He wants to create a system that can allow the business behind the work to become a global brand — one capable of lasting.
That ambition doesn’t seem to contradict his interest in heritage.
If anything, it extends it.
Because perhaps the most meaningful way to honor a tradition isn’t to leave it untouched.
It is to make sure it has somewhere to go.
His textiles sit in that space between what has already been inherited and what has yet to be imagined. They carry histories without becoming historical objects. They draw from African identity without treating it as a fixed visual vocabulary. They move between art and fashion, imagination and reality, craft and contemporary practice.
And ultimately, they ask a simple question:
What else can a tradition become when you allow it to keep evolving?